1 NT is a great opening bid – descriptive to partner and awkward for the opponents. Yes – a 1 NT contract can be tricky to play. However its reputation as tricky is inflated because of all those times when the 1 NT opener is left, when his partner should have rescued him. Essentially, without game values (0-10 points) responder should almost always* rescue into a five-card suit; the weaker his hand, the more imperative the rescue becomes (for 1 NT is likely to be more disastrous). And responder does not need to worry that the 1 NT opener will get ideas above his station: he won’t bid again after the two-level rescue.
* See example hand (iv)
Exercise: which of these responding hands should leave opener in 1 NT and which should rescue?
| Hand (i) | Hand (ii) | Hand (iii) | Hand (iv) |
| ♠ QJ3 | ♠ J9862 | ♠ 82 | ♠ J10 |
| ♥ 987632 | ♥ 7 | ♥ Q9743 | ♥ 8742 |
| ♦ J4 | ♦ J82 | ♦ Q42 | ♦ Q2 |
| ♣ 62 | ♣ K542 | ♣ K52 | ♣ J9742 |
Hand (i): Rescue into 2 ♥ [2 ♦ if playing Transfers]. Holding six hearts, you know your side has an eight-card fit. Note that you cannot be too weak to rescue – there is no six-point rule for responding to 1 NT.
Hand (ii): Rescue into 2 ♠ [2 ♥ if playing Transfers]. No guarantee of an eight-card spade fit, but still way better to rescue, especially given the singleton heart.
Hand (iii): Rescue into 2 ♥ [2 ♦ if playing Transfers], despite being balanced.
Hand (iv): Rescue into 2 ♣, unless you are playing Stayman. If so, you are better passing 1 NT [you can rescue into 3 ♣ via Stayman, but I’d recommend a sixth club to justify going up two extra levels].
|
North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West | North | East | South |
| 1 NT | Pass | 2 ♥ | |
| Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Lead: ♠ K |
| Made 2 |
1 NT by North would have failed by at least two tricks. South made 2 ♥ – in spite of catching just two smallish hearts opposite.
Declarer ducked ♠ K lead and won ♠ J that followed. He led ♦ 2 to ( ♦ 10 and) ♦ Q, then led ♣ 2 to ♣ J, the finesse succeeding. He ruffed ♠ 5, finessed ♣ Q, cashed ♣ A (both following – good) and led ♠ 9. It would have done East no good to ruff – he threw J. Ruffing, declarer now ruffed ♣ 7 with ♥ 10 (West discarding and East overruffing with ♥ Q). East cashed ♦ A, then (holding ♥ A97) led ♥ 7. Declarer (holding ♥ J84) covered with ♥ 8. West won ♥ K, led back to ♥ A, but declarer won the last trick, his eighth, with ♥ J. Contract made.