Book a Course

View all the latest courses going on at the bridge club and book yours now...

What do you want to win

The chess player’s motto - “When you have found a good move, see if you can find a better one” is equally applicable to bridge. Here West’s defence was theoretically sound - he had made a clear signal to partner. But East, as partners can be, was blind or ignorant, and the contract was allowed to make. East’s fault? Yes - but only in part. West had an idiot-proof way to defeat the contract. Cover up East and South’s hand and see if you can find it. 

South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ J 8 7 6
Q J 10
K Q 6
♣ K Q 6
♠ 4
A K 8 4 3
A 8 7 4
♣ 10 8 7
N
W   E
S
♠ Q
9 2
J 9 5 3 2
♣ J 9 5 3 2
  ♠ A K 10 9 5 3 2
7 6 5
10
♣ A 4
West North East South
      1 ♠
Pass 4 ♠ Pass Pass
Pass
4 ♠ by South

West led ♥A and East remembered to signal with ♥9 to encourage a continuation. West duly played ♥K and carefully led ♥8 to the third trick - a “suit-preference signal” for partner - after trumping - to return the higher ranking of the other suits - here ♦s. If West had wanted a ♣ return, he’d lead his lowest ♥ to the third trick. Such signals are most useful in trumping situations - but only if partner is aware of them. Evidently this East was not, for after much agonising and mental coin-tossing, East returned ♣3. Declarer gratefully won ♣A, led ♠A, and cashed dummy’s ♣KQ discarding ♦10. Contract made.

West criticised East for failing to obey the suit-preference signal, but West had an idiot-proof defence - he should simply have cashed ♦A before leading the third ♥ for East to trump.

ANDREW’S TIP: A victorious defence is better than a victorious post-mortem!

ARBC: 31 Parsons Green Lane, London SW6 4HH
Call NOW: 0207 471 4626