Supporting partner’s opened (major) suit is highest priority for responder. Normally he will have four+ cards to support [although he can raise 1 /♠ to 2 /♠ with three cards, when the alternative is the ‘dustbin 1 NT’]. The higher he bids, the better his hand. Here is the
Responder’s Support Line:
| Points: | 0----5 | 6----9 | 10--12 | 13---- |
| Bid: | Pass | Two | Three | Four |
In addition to his point-count, responder should factor in his shape. In particular, shortage (ruffing potential) is very powerful. A doubleton is worth (about) one extra point,
a singleton three and a void five. Having a fifth card in support is also huge: worth (at least) one extra point. Having said all that, though, I should say that the more you play, the less you should compute such strictures and the more you should use your judgement, or ‘feel’.
Exercise: Partner opens 1 ♠. How many would you bid in support with:
| Hand (i) | Hand (ii) | Hand (iii) | Hand (iv) |
| ♠ K982 | ♠ QJ53 | ♠ AJ982 | ♠ A82 |
| ♥ Q73 | ♥ 2 | ♥ Q 10 3 | ♥ 93 |
| ♦ J82 | ♦ KJ432 | ♦ - | ♦ Q8632 |
| ♣ AJ2 | ♣ 762 | ♣ 98432 | ♣ 932 |
Hand (i): Respond 3 ♠, showing four-card support and 10-12 points.
Hand (ii): Respond 3 ♠. Although you have only seven high-card points, the singleton heart is worth about three extra points.
Hand (iii): Respond 4 ♠. The void is worth about five extra points and the fifth spade is also worth a point or so.
Hand (iv): Respond 2 ♠. Showing 6-9 points and often just three card-support (preferably decent – ie headed by a picture).
Click here to play this deal.
|
South Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West | North | East | South |
| 1 ♠ | |||
| Pass | 4 ♠ | Pass | Pass |
| Pass |
| Lead: ♣K |
| Down 1 |
That’s 13 support points: 4 ♠.
The defence to 4 ♠ was very accurate. East overtook West’s ♣ K lead with ♣ A, cashed his singleton A, led over ♣ 7 to (♣ J and) ♣ Q and received a second heart which he could ruff. A swift down one.
Does that mean North’s raise to 4 ♠ on just seven high-card points was a Bridge too far?
Hardly – (a) it took a very unlucky layout (hearts 5-1), coupled with pinpoint defence to defeat 4 ♠; (b) South held a complete minimum opener – an aceless 11 points with four totally wasted minor-suit points and (c) [most compellingly] left to their own devices, East-West would bid and make 6 !
For example, if North had bid only 3 ♠, East would likely have ventured 4 and now West would spring to life.