What constitutes a sequence v Notrumps
You’d lead top of a three-card sequence such as ♣ K from ♣ KQJ53, ♥ Q from ♥ QJ1062, ♠ J from ♠ J10932. This maximises trick-taking by pushing the lower cards out of the picture; and gives partner useful information. How about with broken sequences? Take ♦ QJ942.
|
|
Dummy |
|
|
West |
♦ K 7 5 |
East |
|
♦ Q J 9 4 2. |
---------- |
♦ A 6 3 |
|
|
Declarer |
|
|
|
♦ 10 8 |
|
If (as West) you lead ♦ 4, East has to play ♦ A on dummy’s ♦ 5, or declarer wins a cheap trick. Now ♦ K is promoted. However if you lead ♦ Q, declarer’s ♦ 108 is neutralised and ♦ K is squashed. For example: ♦ Q, ♦ 5, ♦ 3, ♦ 8; ♦ J, ♦ K, ♦ A, ♦ 10; ♦ 6, -, ♦ 9, ♦ 7 then ♦ 4♦ 2 cashed.
From three touching or near-touching cards in your long suit, lead the top of the ‘sequence bit’.
|
|
Holding |
Lead |
|
i) |
♣ K Q 10 5 2 |
Lead ♣ K. |
|
ii) |
♥ J 10 8 3 2 |
Lead ♥ J. |
|
iii) |
♠ 10 9 7 5 2 |
Lead ♠ 10. Note that the sequence has to contain an honour ie the ten or above to qualify. |
|
iv) |
♦ K J 10 6 5 |
Lead ♦ J – the top of the sequence bit. Thus ♦ J lead denies ♦ Q and promises ♦ 10, but does not deny ♦ K or ♦ A. |
|
v) |
♣ Q 10 9 3 2 |
Lead ♣ 10. |
|
vi) |
♥ A J 10 6 4 |
Lead ♥ J. You need three of the top six cards. |
|
vii) |
♠ K 10 9 7 3 |
Lead ♠ 10. |
Please click here to defend this hand
South Deals
E-W Vul |
|
♠ |
K Q 2 |
|
♥ |
A K 2 |
|
♦ |
Q 3 |
|
♣ |
J 10 9 3 2 |
|
|
♠ |
8 5 4 |
|
♥ |
6 5 |
|
♦ |
A J 10 7 2 |
|
♣ |
K 7 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
♠ |
A 10 9 6 3 |
|
♥ |
10 8 7 4 |
|
♦ |
8 6 4 |
|
♣ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
♠ |
J 7 |
|
♥ |
Q J 9 3 |
|
♦ |
K 9 5 |
|
♣ |
A Q 8 6 |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
|
|
1 N |
|
Pass1 |
3 N |
Pass |
Pass |
|
Pass |
|
|
|
-
Too flat for a vulnerable 2♦ (although the suit is good enough).
|
If West leads his fourth highest ♦ 7, declarer can play dummy’s ♦ 3 and win a cheap trick with ♦ 9. This second diamond stopper sees him romp home (plus one). Instead, however West led ♦ J, top of the sequence bit (top of the ‘interior’ or ‘internal’ sequence, as it is sometimes termed).
Declarer tried dummy’s ♦ Q (best) and when it won, he ran ♣ J. Although the finesse lost to West’s ♣ K, declarer was still hopeful, because West could not profitably attack diamonds without presenting declarer a trick with ♦ K. His hopes were soon to be dashed.
West adroitly switched to ♠ 8 (leading high for hate) and East promptly won ♠ A and switched to ♦ 8. A forlorn declarer played ♦ 9, but West won ♦ 10, cashed ♦ A felling ♦ K and tabled ♦ 72. Down two.